I would argue that particular fence already had enough "safety rails" put up around it to justify pointing and laughing at anybody who chose to jump over it, and putting up more will only serve to facilitate the average IQ of our race nose-diving even further.
The idea that this is reasonable simply because the author didn't say the mod lacks child nudity (as opposed to, say, the mod itself actually containing child nudity) lacks any basis in logic. Let's have some standards, here.Īgain, think about it - hitchshar has outright accused Nexus moderation of being paedophiles. They're not, and that idea borders on dangerous. But it'd also make them think their "guilty until someone puts in the very basic effort to confirm otherwise" attitudes are validated. maybe (they're bound to find other ways). It'd help idiots from exposing themselves. Originally posted by ℛaveDZ:It helps prevent some people from assuming it's nude because it's UNP or CBBE like some guys did here and getting a lot of unecessarry hate.
If these mods concern you, then I suggest uninstalling Skyrim because you already have the exact thing you feel to be sexualized.
In conclusion, completely rejecting these mods is the exact same as rejecting vanilla Skyrim children since you're free to make changes to them however you want as well (you don't have to sexualize the vanilla Skyrim or modded children if you don't want to). What you should do in that situation is check the comments and/or contact the mod author and get the necessarry information before jumping to conclusions. But, sometimes it may be confusing and/or not immediately obvious (Perrine author didn't mention the body used nevernude). In that case then it is your responsibility to report that mod. There are also times in which the child mod is presented sexually (nude bodies + skimpy clothing and sexual poses). Seeing the character as sexualized given the conditions that it's technically a different looking vanilla Skyrim child would mean that you yourself are viewing the child sexually. Now, if a mod author creates a child mod with a nevernude body and presents the character in either vanilla Skyrim clothing or cutesy dresses, nor making any suggestive poses, then it is clearly not their intention to sexualize the character. You can either make the child Skimpy and sexualized AF or you could just give them a pretty/cute dress or similar.
There are a variety of outfits compatible with UNP/CBBE, and many of them are not skimpy and/or sexual.įrom this point a modder could give the child character, through various/other mods, clothing of their choice. This means that they would be no different from vanilla (unmodded) children, but would have better compatibility with UNP/CBBE outfits. Giving a child in Skyrim a UNP or CBBE "nevernude" (underwear) mesh would only give them a different body weight (making them look smaller/thinner), but would not make them naked. However, UNP and CBBE can also have bikini/underwear mesh files. Doing this could possibly make them not even look like children anymore. If someone wanted to make them naked, then they would simply change the mesh files with a UNP/CBBE/others nude body, or personal custom mesh if they knew how. Most cancerous part of this thread is that half these idiots have little to no modding experience yet they act like they know what they're on about.įor you ignorant people, I'll make this as simple but informative as possible:Ĭhildren are already in vanilla Skyrim.